Overcoming Zero Trust Roadblocks through Identity

0
Adopting Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA) isn’t just about improving cybersecurity—it also supports business agility and helps ensure continuous productivity. However, implementing ZTNA often faces practical hurdles due to legacy infrastructure, fragmented identity systems, and operational complexity. By making identity central to their ZTNA strategy, organizations can streamline the implementation process and achieve a smoother transition.
Legacy Application Incompatibility

One prominent challenge on the road to ZTNA is the incompatibility of legacy applications with modern identity standards, such as SAML or OpenID Connect (OIDC). These older applications often rely on outdated authentication mechanisms, such as Kerberos, LDAP, or hardcoded credentials, which create security blind spots and vulnerabilities.

Organizations should conduct thorough application inventories to identify protocol compatibility issues. Identity orchestration can help bridge these gaps, providing token translation and secure protocol bridging, enabling legacy systems to integrate securely into modern identity frameworks. Placing legacy applications behind secure gateways or gradually migrating them to modernized identity-supported platforms also significantly mitigates risk.

MFA and Passwordless Complexity

Multi-factor authentication (MFA) and passwordless authentication form the backbone of an identity-focused Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA) architecture. However, integrating these controls across diverse and distributed user groups, such as remote employees and contractors, can be a challenging task.

Deploying risk-based authentication policies that dynamically respond to user behaviors and device postures can simplify complexity. To ensure consistency and reduce friction, use identity orchestration to unify authentication flows. Additionally, adopting widely recognized standards like FIDO2/WebAuthn for passwordless authentication can facilitate smoother, more secure transitions. 

Improving User Experience and Session Consistency

Providing a consistent and seamless user experience is essential for successful ZTNA adoption. Issues such as repeated authentication prompts or inconsistent access experiences can negatively impact user productivity.

Implementing unified single sign-on (SSO) across cloud, on-premises, and legacy environments minimizes disruptions. Cross-domain session management and identity federation further enhance user experience by reducing the frequency of logins, while session-aware access brokers enforce policies without interrupting workflows.

Securing the Remote Workforce

The surge in remote work in recent years has introduced new security considerations, particularly concerning unmanaged or variably secured devices accessing enterprise resources. Ensuring real-time device health validation and enforcing stringent access controls based on identity and context is critical.

Integrating Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) and Mobile Device Management (MDM) within identity-driven access controls ensures continuous device posture assessments. Conditional access policies based on compliance, geo-location, and network anomalies further mitigate risks. Adopting software-defined perimeters (SDP) ensures users can only access resources explicitly authorized through verified identities.

Managing Residual Risks from Legacy Systems

Legacy systems, particularly those that are unpatched or unsupported, pose persistent security risks even within ZTNA frameworks. Such systems may bypass stringent identity controls, potentially facilitating unauthorized access or lateral movement.

To address these issues, organizations should employ virtual patching and strategic network segmentation to isolate vulnerable assets and mitigate potential risks. User and Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) complements these measures by enabling advanced detection and response to anomalies tied to legacy systems. A clear modernization roadmap aligned with business objectives also supports the systematic retirement of high-risk applications.

Avoiding Single Points of Failure

Centralizing identity infrastructure can inadvertently introduce single points of failure, potentially impacting a significant portion of enterprise operations during outages.

Deploying multi-region or multi-identity provider (IDP) strategies, coupled with automated failover mechanisms, reduces dependency on a single identity provider. Regularly testing these failover scenarios is vital for effective business continuity planning.

Best Practices

For a smoother migration to identity-centric ZTNA, organizations should consider the following recommendations:

  • Conduct Comprehensive Readiness Assessments: Clearly understand application compatibility, user access requirements, and business-critical systems.
  • Embrace Identity Orchestration: Leverage orchestration to unify identity systems, streamline authentication processes, and enhance user access experiences.
  • Prioritize Modernization: Transition high-risk legacy applications toward modern, identity-enabled platforms or secure them via ZTNA-compliant gateways.
  • Invest in IAM Resilience: Build redundancy and robust failover capabilities into identity infrastructure, ensuring operational continuity.

ZTNA is more than a security framework. It’s a comprehensive strategy for strengthening business resilience, enhancing productivity, and protecting critical business operations. While ZTNA adoption can present its challenges, placing a deliberate focus on identity systems during the planning and implementation stages will help smooth out the bumps in the road of the migration.

Related News:

Still Using ‘123456’? World Password Day Says It’s Time to Upgrade

National IT Service Provider Day

Share.

About Author

Aldo Pietropaolo is Field CTO of Strata Identity, a provider of identity orchestration technology. He has had over 20 years of experience in the identity industry and was co-founder of Good Dog Labs, where he invented the first identity and access management microservices-based product (Perseus IAM). Good Dog Labs was acquired by Lighthouse Computer Services. He has held senior management roles in identity solutions engineering and architecture with SGNL, Identropy, PwC, HP, RSA, and Securant.